OWNERS files are a way of specifying a set of reviewers whose review is required to modify certain areas of code.
For each file modified in a changelist, a "LGTM" review is required from someone listed in the OWNERS file in that directory, or in the OWNERS file in a parent / higher-level directory of that file. That means that the approver must type "lgtm" (case insensitive) into a comment on the code review.
You want to change code in src/chrome/browser/tab_contents/tab_contents_delegate.h.
Either you or one of the change’s reviewers must be an owner of src/chrome/browser/tab_contents/.
Who owns src/chrome/browser/tab_contents/? Everyone named in src/chrome/browser/tab_contents/OWNERS. In addition, everyone named in src/chrome/browser/OWNERS can review this code, and so on up the directory tree. If no OWNERS file exists in the directory containing a modified file, crawl up the hierarchy to find the nearest one.
You want to do a refactoring and make some changes to ChildProcessHost that require you touch code in many different directories due to a renamed method. You make changes to src/chrome/common/child_process_host.h and to callsites in src/chrome/browser, src/chrome/service, /src/chrome/common, and elsewhere, across 20 different sub directories. You could either get a LGTM from someone listed in the OWNERS file of each of these 20 subdirectories, or you could get a LGTM from someone listed in /src/chrome/OWNERS.
OWNERS are people who are intimately familiar with specific areas of code. They have a deep understanding of how the code works, why it was built the way it was and what needs to happen to the code to improve it.
OWNERS are responsible for ensuring the quality of code in their directory remains high and improves over time.
Only the people who are actively investing energy in the improvement of a directory should be listed as OWNERS.
OWNERS are expected to have demonstrated excellent judgment, teamwork and ability to uphold Chrome development principles. They must understand the development process.
Additionally, for someone to be listed as an OWNER of a directory they must be approved by the other OWNERS of the affected directory. Some guidelines:
The syntax of the OWNERS file is, roughly: lines := (\s* line? \s* "\n")* line := directive | "per-file" \s+ glob "=" directive | comment directive := "set noparent" | email_address | "*" glob := [a-zA-Z0-9_-*?]+ comment := "#" [^"\n"]*
Email addresses must follow the "email@example.com" short form. Filename globs follow the simple UNIX shell conventions ("*" and "?" are supported), and relative and absolute paths are not allowed (globs may only refer to the files in the current directory).
If a user's email is one of the email_addresses in the file, the user is considered an "OWNER" for all files in the directory. A "*" (wildcard) indicates that all committers are owners. If the file contains "set noparent", then OWNERS in parent directories are not searched when checking for reviewers.
If the "per-file" directive is used, the line only applies to files in that directory that match the filename glob specified. If the "set noparent" directive used, then only entries in this OWNERS file apply to files in this directory; if the "set noparent" directive is not used, then entries in OWNERS files in enclosing (upper) directories also apply (up until a "set noparent is encountered"). If "per-file glob=set noparent" is used, then global directives are ignored for the glob, and only the "per-file" owners are used for files matching that glob.
% cat dir/OWNERS