Blink's launch process ensures that interesting features show up as "Intent" threads on the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list. These threads provide a forum for discussion of new features, and go/no-go decisions from API OWNERS, and are a pretty comprehensive view of the feature set that we're planning on providing to developers.
Feature owners generally want the security team to sign off on features before shipping them to the web, and benefit from a contact they can poke with security questions. To that end, it behooves us to proactively skim through these threads to give feedback early, when it's easily actionable. That's where you come in, you wonderful security-minded person, you:
Visit https://bit.ly/blinkintents and find the as-yet untriaged "Intent" threads.
Read through each feature proposed in an "Intent to Implement" or "Intent to Implement and Ship" thread, with an eye for security concerns or interesting side effects that the feature's author might not have considered.
Note: we're assuming here that anything at the "Intent to Ship" stage has gone through wide review, and that deprecation is generally security-positive. If those turn out not to be reasonable assumptions, we can reevaluate what threads we care about.
If you end up with questions, post them to the thread. In particular, it's a good idea to encourage developers to include an explicit "Security Considerations" section in their specification and to read through things like the TAG's self-review questionnaire (bonus points for filing spec bugs if there's a clear way to do so).
If substantial questions are raised, flagging the feature for wider review before launch is reasonable. This could range from a simple comment on the launch bug up through preemptively flipping the Launch-Security flag to "No", depending on how the conversation goes.
If you determine that a particular feature has no security implications at all, head over to the launch bug and flip the Launch-Security flag to NA, along with a comment to that effect.
At the end of your triage shift, send a report to email@example.com with a short description of what you looked at, and how it went (the net-dev@ triage thread is a great model for this).
Hello, feature owner!
This triage rotation is not meant as an approval step. Lack of comments from the security team on an "Intent" thread should not be interpreted as blanket approval. It's meant simply as a mechanism to get more eyes on features earlier in the process, and will hopefully speed up the process of getting those flags flipped on your important launches.