This origin trial is now available.
This experiment will begin in Chrome 85 and end after Chrome 86. During this experiment, you can use an origin trial token to experiment with using portals to load same-origin content (i.e. content served from the same origin as the main page).
Your tokens will periodically expire and need to be renewed using this console.
Thanks for asking! When you renew your origin trial token, we’ll ask for your feedback. This is the best place to explain how you’re using portals, what’s working well, and what isn’t. If you find bugs in Chrome’s implementation (for example, Chrome crashes when you use portals), please file a Chromium bug. Make sure to mention Portals in your report so that the bug is triaged appropriately.
If you identify specific issues with the CG draft specification or the design of the feature (for example, if it’s difficult to achieve the effect you’re looking for using the available API), please file a spec issue.
I've noticed some differences between what Chrome does and what the explainer and/or spec say. What gives?
We apologize for the inconvenience: both are a work in progress.
In some places, the Chrome implementation contains features which haven't been incorporated into the spec. For example:
the <portal> element fires a [load event](https://github.com/WICG/portals/issues/26) similar to <iframe> portal activation [can fail in some cases that aren't yet explained](https://github.com/WICG/portals/issues/185), for example because the page has not yet loaded or failed to load a portal is a single object as seen by screen readers and other accessibility tools, and in this regard is more similar to a link or button than a frame The Chrome implementation integrates with session history and the back button, but this is not yet explained or specified.
In other places, the explainer discusses changes we have not yet implemented in Chrome. For example:
the explainer discusses cross-origin portals, which are not permitted during this origin trial integration with document.requestStorageAccess is alluded to, but not currently implemented in Chrome some changes to how portals are sized and how they interact with rendering and visibility APIs are explained in the API, but currently in Chrome <portal> elements behave in the same way as <iframe> The explainer alludes to integration with feature policy via the allow="" attribute, but this is not yet implemented in Chrome
For the duration of this experiment, pages are only permitted to load URLs that match their origin. This means that the scheme (http or https), full hostname (including subdomains) and port (if specified) must match. This restriction applies to any URLs encountered by following redirects, and any navigations that occur after loading within the portal.
If your content attempts to load a cross-origin URL in a portal, it will be blocked and the previously loaded page, if any, will be displayed instead.
When this happens, a warning will be logged to the developer console, including the origin of the URL that was blocked.
Your load may also be blocked for other reasons. If either document has a Content Security Policy that does not permit embedding, Chrome will respect it. For example, if the URL to be loaded in the portal has a frame-ancestors directive that does not include self (or your origin), the load will be blocked.
First, thanks for trying out Portals! If Portals were previously working for you, you are a developer who has previously turned on the Portals feature flag. (Note that this is not recommended in your main browser, just in your development environment where you're experimenting with Portals.)
This origin trial allows developers like you to enable Portals for Chrome users. Since this experiment does not yet cover loading cross-origin content, we've changed the default behavior to be limited to same-origin content. To return to allowing cross-origin content, enable the cross-origin portals flag via chrome://flags/#enable-portals-cross-origin or run Chrome with the command-line switch --enable-features=PortalsCrossOrigin.
I'm seeing a warning that a <portal> was moved to a document where it was not enabled. What does that mean?
The origin trial enables the portals feature only for documents that supply an origin trial token. If you attempt to make a portal element and then insert it into another document, it will not be able to function correctly in that document.
Portals is a powerful feature, and we need to be able to establish the origin of the content, and of the content it is loading in a portal, in order to ensure that it is used safely. Unfortunately this means that you will need to run an HTTP server in order to experiment with portals.
When inspecting a page using Chrome DevTools (Ctrl + Shift + I or *Right Click
- Inspect*), execution doesn't pause for breakpoints set inside a portalactivate event handler after a portal activates. As a workaround, you can either use console debugging, or inspect the portal page through chrome://inspect/#pages before activation and set a breakpoint there. Breakpoints set when inspecting pages through chrome://inspect work correctly, so they should also work when using remote debugging (chrome://inspect/#devices) to debug a page running on a remote device. This issue is tracked here.